MEDAL OF HONOR ALLIED ASSAULT WALLPAPER FULL

When you shoot the gun ADS, the muzzle flash, recoil, and weapon model are so large that you physically cannot see whatever the hell it is you're aiming at, because the gun takes up the entire screen. For starters, despite iron sights being relatively less common in 2003, this was not a positive innovation.

Probably the worst thing though is the gameplay. Just silence in levels, other than shooting. Allied Assault has Michael Giacchino's incredible soundtrack, whereas CoD has.nothing. Music and sound effects are another thing. You're not going to hear anything about those documents before or after, it's just in there because it's a gameplay feature they have. In Call of Duty, they just throw it in there another 'Press X to blow up ' Or steal documents.

They'd contextualize what you're doing in the pre-mission text, make it feel important. In Allied Assault, they'd often have you steal intel or sabotage equipment or the like, but there'd be good reason for it in the story. And naturally, the exact same experience is going to have far less impact the second time around, particularly when it's done way worse than the original. Start to finish, it is the exact same game, with only a slight difference in the Russian side initially. Vehicle driving segment with the player on a fixed turret? Check.

Go undercover on a sub and blow it up? Check, except now in COD you're the sidekick. Omaha Beach segment? Check, CoD's got the Russian opening levels. Pretty much any and every memorable set piece or interesting gameplay mechanic from AA was reused, except made less fun or interesting. One place I'll give Call of Duty credit though is the multiplayer, that's where the game was really great to play.ДЄllied Assault, easily, there is no comparison.Д¬all of Duty 1 was a complete clone of Allied Assault, except done way worse. CoD kind of ditched the adventure part to try and be more realistic, but it still feels very arcade-i compared to something like Rainbow Six or Ghost Recon. It combines historical realism and attention to detail with a sense of adventure in the vein of Indiana Jones, James Bond. Medal of Honor has an amazing use of music, it makes everything so much more atmospheric, it makes you feel like you are in a movie. The levels in MoH are also more open and fun to explore while CoD ones are completely linear to the bone. Besides, a lot of set pieces have enemies blatantly respawn over and over again. In Call of Duty you have Stalingrad which is something different, but otherwise most of the levels are just the same battleground where you have to kill the enemy at the machine gun nest and then the 5 next soldiers that will take his place. You have a mission where you are undercover in a Submarine base in Norway, then you have Omaha beach, then one where you are infiltrating on a beautiful snowy mountain village in Switzerland (or France?) and you have a silenced pistol that kills everyone in one hit a bit overpowered, but a lot of fun to use.

MEDAL OF HONOR ALLIED ASSAULT WALLPAPER FULL

Medal of Honor has some really great levels full of variety. The gain in realism does not quite make up for how much worse the guns feels to shoot. The shooting mechanics are old school point and shoot, while Call of Duty weapons are terribly inaccurate unless you aim down sights, where the recoil is painful.

Medal of honor allied assault wallpaper